Introduction:

In a resolute response to the severe air pollution crisis engulfing the national capital, the Supreme Court delivered a stern rebuke to the Delhi and Punjab governments. During an extensive hearing addressing the escalating air quality concerns, the Court expressed deep apprehension over the heightened pollution levels, especially in November. In a decisive move, it directed both states to promptly address the burning of agricultural waste, a significant contributor to Delhi’s deteriorating air quality.

Delhi Government’s Responsibilities:

The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Delhi government’s delayed funding of the Delhi-Meerut Regional Rapid Transport System (RRTS) and took a decisive step by redirecting funds from the government’s advertising budget. Emphasizing the non-negotiable nature of compliance with its orders, the Court issued a warning against undermining the authority of the judiciary.

Support for Punjab Farmers:

While holding both Delhi and Punjab accountable for their roles in the air quality crisis, the Supreme Court exhibited a more compassionate stance towards farmers in Punjab. Acknowledging the insufficient representation of farmers, often unjustly blamed for contributing to the crisis, the Court urged the Punjab government to incentivize farmers to refrain from burning stubble. It underscored the state’s responsibility to fund machinery for economically disadvantaged farmers, enabling the safe disposal of farm waste.

Discrepancies in Stubble-Burning Data:

The Court brought attention to discrepancies in the central government’s position on stubble burning. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta asserted that only 10% of Delhi’s air pollution is attributed to stubble burning, prompting the Court to question the Delhi government’s affidavit, which blamed farmers without scientific basis. The Court highlighted the significant contributions of industry, transport, and road dust to pollution, urging state governments to persuade farmers to cease stubble burning for a week.

Emergency Measures and Work-From-Home Recommendations:

Responding to the severity of the crisis, the Supreme Court mandated an emergency meeting of states and authorities to formulate immediate measures. It proposed exploring work-from-home options for employees in and around Delhi and intensifying efforts to control stubble burning.

Conclusion:

The unwavering stance of the Supreme Court underscores the urgency of addressing the air quality crisis in Delhi. While holding governments accountable, the Court advocates for collaborative efforts, acknowledging the challenges faced by farmers and the public alike. The imperative for immediate action and a holistic approach to curb pollution is paramount, as emphasized in the Court’s directives.